Whiteboard Session: The 3 Myths of Collaboration - HBR Video - http:/
I'm a Salesforce Technical Advisor. I live in New Boston, NH with my wife and three sons.
Designing for Connection - http:/
Thanks @ndbob and @kjeannette for being my "thinking partners" - Joy and Necessity of Micro-Collaborations - http:/
A beginner’s guide to beefing up your privacy and security online - http:/
The Distribution of Users’ Computer Skills: Worse Than You Think - http:/
Is that a purse or a padlock? The "Department of Chromeland Security" is on a mission - http:/
Crap detection is a foundational skill for #netlit - Strategies to decipher what is real... - http:/
On Digital Literacies – ProfHacker - The Chronicle of Higher Education - http:/
The community of practice identity test - http:/
Disconnected, fragmented, or united? a trans-disciplinary review of network science | Applied Network Science | Full Text
During decades the study of networks has been divided between the efforts of social scientists and natural scientists, two groups of scholars who often do not see eye to eye. In this review I present an effort to mutually translate the work conducted by scholars from both of these academic fronts hoping to continue to unify what has become a diverging body of literature. I argue that social and natural scientists fail to see eye to eye because they have diverging academic goals. Social scientists focus on explaining how context specific social and economic mechanisms drive the structure of networks and on how networks shape social and economic outcomes. By contrast, natural scientists focus primarily on modeling network characteristics that are independent of context, since their focus is to identify universal characteristics of systems #netlit
